Skip to main content

Employee Attrition - By Sanjay Anandaram

I received am email from the CEO of a company that had just lost a few employees. These ex-employees had apparently started a competing company. Here’s an extract from the CEO’s mail:

“ Why does this happen? Another example is Wipro… there are so many ex-Wiproites with their own companies now. I also know of an education institute called Vignan in Guntur, Andhra Pradesh. Today there are at least 10 similar sized institutes, which are started by ex-Vignan staff.
• Does it happen because employees don’t get to grow in their companies? But this may not be true in Wipro?
• Does it happen because employees have seen the 360 degree of running a company and are now confident?
• Is it good for the companies?
• Should we take measures to stop this happen to us?”

Well, people leave their jobs for multiple reasons – emotional, professional, social and economic. What do employees seek in a job in the first place? Various studies have been conducted that generally converge on the following needs of employees: opportunities for responsibility and challenge as well as to develop themselves professionally. Career opportunities for growth are therefore critical. Of course, the pay has to be fair but buying people’s “loyalty” through high salaries is not necessary or even good for the company or the employee. This in turn means that the company must be grow in order to provide opportunities for its employees. Career development opportunities are also critical in that they help employees enhance their capabilities and marketability. Training and counseling are therefore important inputs that need to be provided.

Leadership needs to constantly communicate with their employees in a transparent manner, develop trust and confidence through the framing of fair and friendly policies and more importantly in their honest practice without compromising company productivity and performance expectations. These could range from having flexible working schedules to policies that support education enhancement to health benefits to even dress codes and time-off for self and family affairs. But communicate what? Communicate the company’s culture, goals, performance, and plans. Enlist employee involvement in problem solving, in securing feedback and getting suggestions. More importantly, the feedback and suggestions need to be acknowledged and acted upon in an honest manner.

There are many companies that seem to regularly lose management talent but yet continue to grow. The secret lies in the ability of these companies to create top class management talent across various tiers of the company. They provide both career advancement as well as career development opportunities. But why then do people leave? People leave when they perceive that the sound background and experience they’ve acquired can be better monetized outside the walls their current company. When they wish to be the masters of their own destiny through the pursuit of entrepreneurial ambitions. When opportunities for career advancement are no longer visible. When a company starts to lose its connection with its people. Mentoring, counseling and development of employees therefore need to happen on a continuous basis across the company by all managers.

Now, should companies prevent the leaving of all employees? Of course, losing a trained employee is a loss to any company; however, it is a good practice to let go off people who just don’t seem to fit with a company’s culture and value system or who just can’t seem to deliver in spite of opportunities and chances provided. But what of the others who wish to leave?

I don’t believe it is worthwhile to force an employee to stay if his/her mind is made up. On the other hand, when good employees move, they stay in touch with their former colleagues. Employees don’t necessarily join competitors but leave to join customer companies, suppliers and partners. These relationships help in establishing new business possibilities in sales, outsourcing contracts and even M & A. According to an article in the May 2008 Sloan Management Review “Rethinking the War for Talent” the authors say “…social capital created by the movement of employees across companies can be a key source of competitive advantage.”

What do you think?

Sanjay Anandaram is a passionate advocate of entrepreneurship in India; He brings two decades of experience as an entrepreneur, corporate executive, venture investor, faculty member, advisor and mentor. He’s involved with Nasscom, TiE, IIM-Bangalore, and INSEAD business school in driving entrepreneurship. He can be reached at The views expressed here are his own.

Popular posts from this blog

How I Raised Funding - Priyanka Agarwal, Wishberry

You have to be confident and shameless while crowdfunding. Priyanka Agarwal, Wishberry shares on how to succeed in crowd funding with Venture Intelligence in this  interview. Priyanka also candidly shares how the team built Wishberry, raised funding from top angel investors like Rajan Anandan, on pivoting, and difficulties in raising capital for entrepreneurs operating in niche spaces not chased by VCs. Q: What does Wishberry do?Priyanka Agarwal: In its latest avatar, Wishberry has pivoted into crowd financing of low budget films (INR 1-5 Cr). We are essentially trying to create an internet platform for investment opportunities for HNIs in films including Marathi, Tamil, Kannada, or films targeting the global diaspora.

L-R: Co-founders Anshulika Dubey & Priyanka Agarwal, Wishberry Given that you are building a marketplace, how did Wishberry solve the Chicken and Egg problem? Beyond the “all or nothing” model what did Wishberry do to pull in more artistes and investors? First, you…

Interview with One97's Vijay Shekhar Sharma

Venture Intelligence featured an interview with Vijay Shekhar Sharma, Founder & Managing Director of One97 Communications as part of the July issue of the US-IVCA / Venture IntelligenceIndia VC report. One97 is one of the pioneering start-ups in the Indian Mobile VAS space and recently raised its first round of funding led by SAIF Partners.

Some extracts from the interview:

VI: How were you funding the company until now?
VSS: We were the first company to put a revenue sharing model in place with operators. That gave us recurring revenue and made the company cash positive.

VI: What were your challenges in fund raising?
VSS: Two challenges: first, deciding on the network the fund could provide and second, the kind of size commitment they can make for future investments. A third factor was the comfort with the VC: what kind of team it was, the chemistry between team members, the kind of person who will come onto our board. The VC on the board becomes your everyday business partner.


Poor Son to Rich Son - A Sales Story

Hat tip: I originally saw this in the reply to a message posted by a friend of a friend on Google+ and then lost the thread in the circles of Google+. Apologies!

Arun Natarajan is the Founder & CEO of Venture Intelligence, the leading provider of data and analysis on private equity, venture capital and M&A deals in India. Click Here to learn about Venture Intelligence products that help entrepreneurs reach out effectively to the investing community.