Skip to main content

Investments or Expenses? - By Sanjay Anandaram

In the tough economic times such as the one we’re currently facing, the pervasive and prudent mantra is to conserve cash, hunker down, reduce expenses and somehow survive till better times arrive. But then what expenses should one cut? Where should the costs be reduced? Should investments be stopped?

I’ve received mails from entrepreneurs asking the above questions. In order to answer these questions, it is important to understand the differences between the terms. Semantics aside, understanding of the terms will also help decide where to save and where not to. Lets take a simple example.

Your company decides to participate in a day long event for which 500 samples of your product are procured for Rs 5L. However, only 400 samples were handed out, since only 400 customers showed up, leaving 100 samples that could be used for another event next month. The costs incurred by your company is therefore Rs 5L while Rs 4L were the expenses for the event and the 100 unused samples worth Rs 1L are assets. Expenses therefore mean a cost that has been incurred while undertaking revenue generating activities. A cost may or may not be an expense, for example, in the case of land that your company acquires since the land does not get used up and depreciated. Computers purchased by your company will initially be recorded as assets on the balance sheet while their costs each year become depreciation expenses in the profit & loss statement as they get used in generating revenues.

Should technology costs be treated as an asset (capitalized) or should they be expenses as costs are incurred? Investments and assets are those costs that are expected to result in revenues over a future time period. This depends on the nature of the company’s business and how critical the technology development is for future revenues. For a software company building software IP, the technology can be largely capitalized. Sales costs for example are generally treated as expenses since the revenue impact is felt within the financial year. However, marketing costs are more difficult to segregate between an investment and an expense. Again, the nature of the business plays a role. For example, if the company is in the business of developing and creating brands, then a significant portion of marketing costs can be treated as investments while for other companies, they can be treated as expenses since results may be expected within the year. In a management consulting company, the biggest cost is the people cost. However, their intellectual property (patents, knowhow, processes) are their assets and management needs to decide how much they’ll invest in growing their IP based on their assessment of its revenue generating ability over a period of time.

So in these troubled times, what should a startup do? Since the first goal is to conserve cash it is important to only incur those costs that can be expensed against revenues. If there are existing assets, it is time to dust those assets and make those assets sweat to generate revenues. Many companies talk of their people being their greatest assets, so it should not be a surprise if making these assets work harder, longer and smarter to generate more revenues is one way of making “assets sweat!” In spite of their best efforts, if there’s no visibility of revenues in the foreseeable future companies shed their assets. Shedding assets could mean selling physical assets (buildings and land) to generate cash or letting go of people assets as companies cannot afford to keep incurring costs if these cannot be expensed against revenues.

As is obvious, serious consideration and judgement is required in reaching conclusions about whether to look at costs as investments or expenses and in estimating how and when revenues can be realized. Misrepresentation or erroneous classification can lead to inaccurate financial statements and to other very serious problems as the recent Satyam case has highlighted.

What do you think?

Sanjay Anandaram is a passionate advocate of entrepreneurship in India; He brings two decades of experience as an entrepreneur, corporate executive, venture investor, faculty member, advisor and mentor. He’s involved with Nasscom, TiE, IIM-Bangalore, and INSEAD business school in driving entrepreneurship. He can be reached at sanjay@jumpstartup.net. The views expressed here are his own.

Popular posts from this blog

How I Raised Funding - Priyanka Agarwal, Wishberry

You have to be confident and shameless while crowdfunding. Priyanka Agarwal, Wishberry shares on how to succeed in crowd funding with Venture Intelligence in this  interview. Priyanka also candidly shares how the team built Wishberry, raised funding from top angel investors like Rajan Anandan, on pivoting, and difficulties in raising capital for entrepreneurs operating in niche spaces not chased by VCs. Q: What does Wishberry do? Priyanka Agarwal : In its latest avatar, Wishberry has pivoted into crowd financing of low budget films (INR 1-5 Cr). We are essentially trying to create an internet platform for investment opportunities for HNIs in films including Marathi, Tamil, Kannada, or films targeting the global diaspora. L-R: Co-founders Anshulika Dubey & Priyanka Agarwal, Wishberry Given that you are building a marketplace, how did Wishberry solve the Chicken and Egg problem? Beyond the “all or nothing” model what did Wishberry do to pull in more arti...

Profile of Career Forum founder

The Starship Enterprise column in The Economic Times (not available online), featured Sujata Khanna of entrance exam training institute, Career Forum. The company, which started with just seven students in Pune, now covers over 39 cities reaching over 15,000 students. ...The most important milestone I think was in 1995 when we decided to incorporate Career Forum into a Company. This brought in a lot of professionalism and we also went for expansion. ...Strong technical network is our unique selling proposition. We have a strong ERP system running across all centres in all areas of business from distribution to logistics... Arun Natarajan is the Founder & CEO of Venture Intelligence, the leading provider of information and networking services to the Private Equity and Venture Capital ecosystem in India. View sample issues of Venture Intelligence India newsletters and reports.

Should VCs buy out angels?

Interesting discussion at VentureWoods between Deepak Shenoy and Roshan D'Silva on this " perennial topic ". Here are their first posts (in the comments section): Deepak Shenoy said, Alok, true - there is reason to think about why one wants to exit. As a stock market investor, I have made decisions to sell companies at (say) 400% profits, when the company went on towards 1000% of what I bought - yet, I wasn’t sulking in a corner. Because a) 400% is pretty nice and b) I’d reached that comfort level of profits. Angels may not want to stay the distance, which could be much longer than their cash needs, and if the current valuation is attractive enough for them to exit. As individuals I would imagine that angel investors are the kinds that put in Rs. 10 lakhs to Rs. 50 lakhs in a business - and honestly, there are a number of such people who have this kind of cash lying idle in bank accounts (idle = they don’t need it right now). Such people can be angels, but they won’t b...