Skip to main content

Baggage of Experience - Article by Sanjay Anandaram

The meeting ended with a list of “to-dos” for each of the startup team members. Everyone appeared charged and excited. Yet one of the members appeared less enthusiastic. Upon having a discussion with him, he said that he had the longest list of to-dos, with almost 15 specific items! More importantly, he felt that most of them would be a waste of his time as he was sure that executing them wouldn’t really benefit the company.

A few weeks later at a follow-up meeting where the status of these to-dos were being reviewed, it transpired that only 2 of the 15 items on this individual’s list had been done and that too only in part. He explained that he hadn’t followed through on the execution of the 13 items as “given my earlier experience (in another company), I was sure they wouldn’t work”; But what of the part execution of the 2? Ah, the completion of those items required inputs from others and since those inputs weren’t forthcoming, the work couldn’t be completed in full.

When the individual was asked if he was sure that the 2 items that were to be implemented would benefit the company, he said there was a “high probability”. In other words, there was still uncertainty. All of us carry baggage from our past experiences. Those experiences colour our decision making abilities in the present and future. The real issues to consider while arriving at decisions relate to the context, environmental situation and applicability of the past experiences to the present. And to give in to and stay with the temptation of applying the learnings from the past without appreciating the nuances. For example, certain marketing campaigns that didn’t work in say, the earlier context of a fast-food chain cannot be used as templates for decision making in another context of say, on-line travel.

In a startup and in the Indian context, it is very hard and indeed impractical to use the past as a predictor of the future in a vast majority of the cases. In most cases, the business opportunities and customer segments are brand new, are growing fast, and there are a slew of new companies with new approaches attempting to cater to these opportunities. For example, Airtel wouldn’t have been a successful brand if it had attempted to learn from the marketing efforts of BSNL. Or, if a Make My Trip had attempted to learn from the efforts of a P & G. Obviously, there are some high level learnings – at the level of universal abstractions – that are uniformly applicable but these are about as useful to a startup as saying that one is addressing the issue of world hunger or peace! The context, the details, the nuances, the model etc are where the devil lies.

If no one knows what will work, what should the startup do? Short answer: try out all possibilities! As fast and as smartly as possible. Learn from the experiments in the market, adapt and re-launch the campaigns or programmes. Some will work, most won’t. Those that work start becoming the fulcrum of the company’s “strategy”, the kind that provides material for 20:20 hindsight laden speeches that the CEO will make in the future, if the startup is reasonably successful. Given that speed is one of the great advantages the startup has, ensuring that all functions of the company operate at top gear and beyond is crucial. Mistakes will happen but then there will be enough time to rectify them if one moves fast enough. Technology is ensuring that cycle times are getting dramatically shortened, hence decision making and consequent action needs to be operate in tandem.

Waiting for feedback or inputs from some others in order to complete one’s task isn’t going to be helpful to the startup that’s focused on growing. In the example quoted above, the executive team member was harming the company far more by inaction and by mindless application of a past experience. It is crucial to learn to identify these behaviours and take suitable action – counseling, training, mentoring – to ensure that the culture of action and the consequent learnings are what guide the startup in today’s India.

Sanjay Anandaram is a passionate advocate of entrepreneurship in India; He brings close to two decades of experience as an entrepreneur, corporate executive, venture investor, faculty member, advisor and mentor. He’s involved with Nasscom, TiE, IIM-Bangalore, and INSEAD business school in driving entrepreneurship. He can be reached at sanjay@jumpstartup.net. The views expressed here are his own.

Popular posts from this blog

How I Raised Funding - Priyanka Agarwal, Wishberry

You have to be confident and shameless while crowdfunding. Priyanka Agarwal, Wishberry shares on how to succeed in crowd funding with Venture Intelligence in this  interview. Priyanka also candidly shares how the team built Wishberry, raised funding from top angel investors like Rajan Anandan, on pivoting, and difficulties in raising capital for entrepreneurs operating in niche spaces not chased by VCs. Q: What does Wishberry do? Priyanka Agarwal : In its latest avatar, Wishberry has pivoted into crowd financing of low budget films (INR 1-5 Cr). We are essentially trying to create an internet platform for investment opportunities for HNIs in films including Marathi, Tamil, Kannada, or films targeting the global diaspora. L-R: Co-founders Anshulika Dubey & Priyanka Agarwal, Wishberry Given that you are building a marketplace, how did Wishberry solve the Chicken and Egg problem? Beyond the “all or nothing” model what did Wishberry do to pull in more arti...

Profile of Career Forum founder

The Starship Enterprise column in The Economic Times (not available online), featured Sujata Khanna of entrance exam training institute, Career Forum. The company, which started with just seven students in Pune, now covers over 39 cities reaching over 15,000 students. ...The most important milestone I think was in 1995 when we decided to incorporate Career Forum into a Company. This brought in a lot of professionalism and we also went for expansion. ...Strong technical network is our unique selling proposition. We have a strong ERP system running across all centres in all areas of business from distribution to logistics... Arun Natarajan is the Founder & CEO of Venture Intelligence, the leading provider of information and networking services to the Private Equity and Venture Capital ecosystem in India. View sample issues of Venture Intelligence India newsletters and reports.

Should VCs buy out angels?

Interesting discussion at VentureWoods between Deepak Shenoy and Roshan D'Silva on this " perennial topic ". Here are their first posts (in the comments section): Deepak Shenoy said, Alok, true - there is reason to think about why one wants to exit. As a stock market investor, I have made decisions to sell companies at (say) 400% profits, when the company went on towards 1000% of what I bought - yet, I wasn’t sulking in a corner. Because a) 400% is pretty nice and b) I’d reached that comfort level of profits. Angels may not want to stay the distance, which could be much longer than their cash needs, and if the current valuation is attractive enough for them to exit. As individuals I would imagine that angel investors are the kinds that put in Rs. 10 lakhs to Rs. 50 lakhs in a business - and honestly, there are a number of such people who have this kind of cash lying idle in bank accounts (idle = they don’t need it right now). Such people can be angels, but they won’t b...